The Tom Bearden





Energy from the Vacuum

"Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts & Principles"
Order Now!

Help support the research



Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:39:44 -0500


Dear Mr. Wang,


Unfortunately I'm quite a bit disabled after my heart attack in 2001, with continuing hypoxia and also developing pulmonary fibrosis. I can drive locally, stand for about two minutes, walk about 100 feet, and that is it. I cannot travel to any distance.


My wife also had a stroke in 2003, followed by two heart attacks. So she is disabled. I care for us, buy our food and bring in (neither of us is able to cook), etc.


Note also that I'm not a bench person, so I do not personally build anything on the bench. Instead, usually I work with inventors who do, and my job is to try to decipher the nature of the odd phenomenology they uncover.


Just about everything I know about scalar interferometry is already on my website, in the books and papers, etc. That includes the basic technical references.


These days, what little time I have available is spent on trying to help resolve the escalating world energy crisis, before it generates giant economic collapses in many major nations, including both the U.S., China, and many others.


If you have scientists there who are interested in relatively inexpensive and fairly quick solutions to the energy crisis, I would be happy to meet with your representatives in my home here in Huntsville and steer them into the appropriate areas and projects for quick and clean and permanent solution.


These include:


(1) Watergas (the mechanism for how to easily trick a container of water to have the O-H bonds disappear, so that the water molecules in the affected container fall apart into H2 and O2 gas, which can then easily be burned directly in a slightly modified combustion chamber of an automobile. Since salt water works well, one can thus take one's "fuel" directly from the inexhaustible and free oceans of the world). Dr. Kanzius has developed this process and it has been independently tested and verified by a world authority in water chemistry. To understand the actual mechanism, one has to restore the negative energy and negative probabilities to physics that were arbitrarily removed in 1934. The leading physicists other than Dirac hated it (you can “unhappen” a thing after it has already happened and is physically real), and that frightened most of the theoreticians.
     As a bonus, by developing the negative energy technique used to generate watergas, one also gets a process that is adaptable to cure most present dread diseases such as cancer and many others. The developed disease condition is simply “unhappened” by stimulating the local vacuum to contain negative energy and start applying negative probabilities. Dr. Kanzius also has a cancer cure based on this process, and it is being developed by a legitimate cancer research institute. See Steven M. Sweeny, “Kanzius sees success: Millcreek inventor's treatment kills cancer cells in rabbits”, Erie Times News, Oct. 31, 2007. (Note: Doctor Steven Curley, M.D. is using the Kanzius RF device for research at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas).

     Phase I animal trials have been completed, and the process cured 100% of all the tumors in the animals tested.


(2) A method (already obscurely known in optical physics) whereby one can extract excess usable EM energy from the gigantic curled Heaviside EM energy flow component that is unaccounted but accompanies every accounted feeble Poynting energy flow component. One uses a little general relativity operation (negative resonance absorption of the self-oscillating medium) to provide an output of some 18 times as much energy as one inputs in one's Poynting energy input component. We actually input the giant Heaviside component also, but it is presently arbitrarily unaccounted.

     The great advantage for China, for developing this mechanism, is that it allows the straightforward development of self-powering steam boilers, taking all their input energy freely from the vacuum. So in all those coal-burning plants that China has or is building and deploying, the actual fuel burning can be stopped once the modified steam boiler is up and running and is switched into self-powering mode. This will rapidly remove the present soot from those plants that is strangling Chinese cities. It also allows use of most of each present system already installed and paid for -- something that is of great financial benefit to China.
     Also, instead of a giant windmill farm or giant solar cell array, one can use a single windmill or a much smaller solar array, to kick start a self-powering steam-boiler. Once it is going and switched to self-powering, its output can be used to kick-start as many other steam-boilers as necessary.


(3) How to produce and use permanent magnets with asymmetric fields, so that one easily uses them to assemble self-powering permanent magnet motors and motor-generators. Any magnetic motor is powered by the broken symmetry established between its forward mmf and back mmf regions. Usually we are taught to put in a coil and send in extra electric power that we pay for, just to break that symmetry. But nature does not care whether we pay for the broken symmetry or whether we trick the magnets into providing it automatically. This process seems to already be directly developed -- and appropriated and stopped -- by the U.S. Department of Energy. Simply check out these patents:
     (a) Vijay K. Chandhok and Bao-min Ma. “Method for producing a noncircular permanent magnet”.  United States Patent No. 4,915,891 issued April 10, 1990.

     (b) Vijak K. Chandhok, WO/2001/084569 A1) “Method for Producing through Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”, International patent, 9 Mar. 2001.

     Note (quoting): “This invention was made with government support under a small business research and development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97-ER82313). The Government has certain rights to this invention.”

     (c) Vijak K. Chandhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No. 6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.


There are others; see the paper on my website that discusses the solutions to the present energy crisis, permanently and cleanly and cheaply and quickly.


Hope this is of interest to you. The entire world needs the "free energy from the vacuum" development, and it would be of enormous benefit to all the nations and peoples of the earth if China were to move quickly and furnish these developments.


If so, there will never be an energy crisis as long as humanity endures, anywhere on this planet.


Very best wishes,


Tom Bearden, Ph.D.



P.S. I enclose a slightly altered letter below, sent to a pesky but very expensive energy publication, which may be of interest to you also.



Dear (publication):


I don’t see anything of real interest in your publication; just the standard stuff. You don’t really have a single writer who understands the cause of the world energy crisis, what really caused it in 1892, and what to do about it. And you are probably not going to have such a writer.


Put it this way. We’ve had group theory in our universities since 1870. One who gets a doctorate in physics will know some group theory, whereas our electrical engineers normally will not, even with a doctorate. Ugh! So what has group theory (and lack of knowledge of it by our electrical power engineers) got to do with the world energy crisis? The answer is, “Everything!”


Maxwell’s theory is a higher group theory electrodynamics. It was never adopted in the universities, because folks at the time hated those bloody quaternions with a passion, even though Maxwell loved them. Why -- electricians would say -- the poor electricians are lucky if they have had university algebra and calculus, without such a horrendous mess as quaternions! Since there were less than three dozen “electricians” (what we would call “electrodynamicists”) in the world’s universities at the time, then that attitude and reception doomed Maxwell’s actual theory – which is some 20 quaternion and quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns. You can do LOTS of things in Maxwell’s original theory that are absolutely impossible in the highly curtailed electrical engineering model.


His theory is given in James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover, New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. Two errata are given on the unnumbered page prior to page 1 of Vol. 1.


Maxwell died of stomach cancer in 1879, with his theory never adopted. Immediately some scientists jumped in and tore those terrible quaternions apart – notably Heaviside (brilliant, but never even attended university; he merely bought books and learned himself), Hertz, and Gibbs.


When what is today known as “electrical engineering” was then first being painfully contrived and formed there in the 1880s etc., and was not yet even born, they took Heaviside’s highly restricted vector equations (NOT Maxwell’s quaternion theory) as the basis for the new “electrical engineering” model.


Note that, at the time, Tesla destroyed the vast DC electric power empire being promoted by Edison backed by J. P. Morgan. Backed by Westinghouse, Tesla waltzed in and installed far more practical AC generators at Niagara Falls, much cheaper than Morgan and Edison proposed for their DC generators, and the world found that AC power could be transmitted down long transmissions lines very practically. One did not have to build a huge expensive DC power plant every 10 to 20 miles! Thereafter the world flipped over and went with AC power.


So that buried Morgan’s grandiose plans for a vast DC power financial empire. An embittered Morgan vowed to utterly destroy Tesla as his mortal enemy. That he did, and he also financially destroyed Westinghouse, Tesla’s backer. At that point he had set the trap for Tesla. To complete his grandiose plans, Tesla had only J. P. Morgan available to finance him. So Tesla came with hat in hand to Morgan, and the wily Morgan forced him to sign over 51% of all his inventions, in return for financing him. And he deliberately only gave Tesla half the money required, which doomed Tesla to failure because of he simply ran out of funds. Tesla – the greatest inventor of the 18th and 19th centuries – was then reduced to living in a little hotel room essentially on charity of his friends etc.


Before the full transpiration of all that, other factors developed behind the scenes. That fool Tesla (who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that makes generators possible, and also gave us radio and many other things) had discovered that the “medium itself was active” – and he was hell-bent on producing free energy systems and giving them to the world. So in Morgan’s view, Tesla had to be stopped at any cost. J. P. Morgan set up the plan that did destroy Tesla, and he directed his science advisors to also examine those newfangled Heaviside equations and see if they still contained any of those confounded “energy freely from the active medium” systems that Tesla was pursuing so vigorously and planned to freely give to the world.


Morgan’s science advisors did a simple group theoretical analysis of the Heaviside vector equations, and it showed that the Heaviside original equations still contained some of those asymmetric Maxwellian EM systems – the kind that Tesla had discovered that would accept and use excess EM energy freely taken from the active vacuum (in modern physics terms) itself.


So Morgan coldly ordered his scientists to “Fix it!”


Lorentz – a great scientist but also a sharpie noted for appropriating other people’s work and taking credit for it – was the one preparing the equations to be used as the theoretical model for the new “electrical engineering” that was to be launched in the universities slowly but uniformly. To see that Lorentz was “approachable”, the reader is referred to J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Okun and the great electrodynamicist Jackson discuss the roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first. Lorentz simply took Lorenz’s symmetrization of the equations and used it and took credit for it. This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit for it.


So Morgan’s science advisors got to Lorentz, and he easily “solved Morgan’s problem”. He simply regauged the original Heaviside equations to make them symmetrical (using Lorenz’s symmetrization but appropriating the work as his own), thereby quite arbitrarily tossing out all self-powering and COP>1.0 energy-from-the-vacuum electrical systems from the modified (symmetrized) Heaviside equations. He did this little beautiful dirty work in 1892.


See H. A. Lorentz, "La Théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants," [The Electromagnetic Theory of Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch. Néerl. Sci., Vol. 25, 1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected Papers, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, vol. 2, pp. 168-238, esp. p. 168.] This is the work that Lorentz cites later (in 1895) for his proof of the symmetrical regauging theorems (the two equations of symmetrical regauging).


So this horribly crippled and mangled “tiny, tiny bit” of Maxwell’s original theory was what was deliberately used by Lorentz to set up the electrical engineering model, which then was gradually introduced into all the universities worldwide and generated the present “electrical engineering”. From the very beginning, it was deliberately designed specifically to prevent engineering and developing electrical power systems freely receiving and using their input EM energy from the seething vacuum/spacetime itself. All EM energy comes from the vacuum anyway, via the broken symmetry of the source dipole inside the generator or source. But symmetrized systems use half their freely collected “energy from the vacuum” in the external circuit, to do nothing but destroy the source dipole inside the generator, thereby shutting off the flow of EM energy from the terminals. So to keep energy flowing, we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator to change the input mechanical energy into rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator (courtesy of Nikola Tesla), which in turn is dissipated right inside the generator to force opposite charges apart and reform the source dipole that our electrical engineers build the external circuit to keep destroying faster than they power the loads!


Burning all that fuel to crank the generator shaft has nothing at all to do with directly powering the external circuit! All it does is to continue to restore and remake the internal source dipole and its broken symmetry, which then extracts that energy from the local vacuum, coherently integrates it to quantal size, and pours it out of the generator terminals as real, observable, usable EM energy flow.


Yet our electrical engineers of today are not even taught what actually powers the electrical system, even though the basis for it was predicted by Lee and Yang more than a half century ago. Their prediction was immediately experimentally proven by Wu and her colleagues in Feb. 1957, and it sparked such a vast revolution in physics that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in the same year, in Dec. 1957.


In the half century since that great discovery and revolution in physics, its impact has not made it across the university campus from the physics department to the electrical engineering department.


And that horribly mangled, crippled piece of theoretical junk called “electrical engineering” is still being taught in every university as the official electrical engineering model equations. All that set-up to deliberately cripple all future electrical engineering was done before there was any such thing as modern physics, which was not even born at the time. Indeed, that’s about the time the physicists finally discovered the electron, and they were still arguing fiercely whether or not such a thing as an “atom” existed. They had only recently and begrudgingly accepted the molecule!


That horrible and mutilated old electrical engineering model of today contains more than a dozen known falsities (absolute lies), pointed out by Nobel Prize winners and eminent scientists to no avail whatsoever. The pundits in control of things still want us to keep burning all that coal, oil, etc. and vastly enriching their coffers and their financial control. As a single example, there are no force fields in massless space, because mass is a component of force by the simple equation F = d/dt(mv). Put in m = 0 for massless space, and immediately F = 0. But the silly electrical engineer is still taught that there are “force fields in space”.


At least J. D. Jackson – a renowned classical electrodynamicist – admits that the force field in vacuum is merely assumed, then sweeps the problem away. Quoting Jackson:


"Most classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the product of charge and field." [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 249].


Then Morgan got another shock. That fool Heaviside (who was one of the two men who first advanced the flow of energy through space -- before that time it did not appear in the notions of physics) also discovered that every generator and other EM power source already pours out from its terminals, into space surrounding and along the external conductors, a fantastically huge stream of real EM energy in peculiar form – in a curled form which (in any special relativity situation) cannot be diverged into the wires to power up the electrons. This is in addition to the feeble little Poynting component which does get diverged into the wiring and does power up the circuit.


Well, again Morgan fumed furiously. If our future young EE’s in all our universities were to be taught that every generator already pours out more than a trillion times as much EM energy flow as the mechanical energy we pay to crank into the shaft and input, then eventually one of those sharp young devils would figure out how to use some of that vast energy flow output (simply use a general relativity situation, such as the NRAM or negative resonance absorption of the medium optical physics process that outputs 18 times as much as the Poynting EM energy flow component of one’s input). And that would destroy any further need for fuel etc. except for a tiny tad just to get started. And that would have destroyed the energy barons of the early 20th century, including Morgan himself.


To see that Tesla knew exactly what he was after, we quote Tesla himself:


"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891.].


“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels."


“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].


"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].


After Tesla’s suppression, he expressed the truth about the universal electrical engineering model in these words:


"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." [Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.]


Seventy-two years later, the eminent electrodynamicist T. W. Barrett – also a cofounder of ultrawideband radar – rigorously proved that Tesla’s actual patented circuits could in fact shuttle the potential energy around at will, as Tesla had to do if he was to build his asymmetric circuits and obtain free energy directly from the seething vacuum/spacetime. See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions (essentially Maxwell’s original theory!) allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that the investigated Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.


So again Morgan’s henchmen got to Lorentz and had him “fix” the problem. In 1900 he taught the professors to arbitrarily integrate the entire energy flow vector itself (containing both the Poynting diverged component and the giant curled Heaviside component) around a closed surface assumed around any volume of interest. That very neatly separates and retains the diverged Poynting component, while discarding the giant curled Heaviside component. Lorentz also taught them that this component could “have no physical significance”, which is still the view today. E.g., quoting J. D. Jackson:


"...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that the curl of any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term can, however, have no physical consequences. Hence it is customary to make the specific choice …" [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237].


Jackson’s statement is true in any special relativity situation, since the divergence of the curl then equals zero. However, it does not necessarily hold in a general relativistic situation, where the divergence of the curl need not be zero after all.


To see how easy it is to obtain free EM energy – all you wish – from the seething universal vacuum, simply do this:


Place a charged capacitor or electret on top of a simple permanent magnet lying on the table, so that the E-field of the electrical component is orthogonal to the H-field of the magnet. Then by every EM textbook in every electrical engineering department in every university in the world, the Poynting energy flow section assures us that this simple gadget will sit there and steadily and freely pour out real Poynting EM energy flow S, given by the simple little equation S = E X H. The two dipoles of that contraption exhibit broken symmetry, as proven by the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in 1957. And as Nobelist Lee pointed out, when we have a broken symmetry then something previously “virtual” (subquantal) becomes observable (integrated into quantal size). So that simple, idiotic thing – costing maybe two dollars – is continuously absorbing free virtual photons from its seething vacuum interaction, coherently integrating the subquantal excitations into quantal size, and steadily emitting real, observable photons (real, measurable, usable EM energy).


So the simplest thing in the universe is to easily evoke – for peanuts – a powerful “EM energy wind”. At will, anywhere, and it will freely pour out that free flow of real EM energy wind until the end of time if you just leave it alone.


Every dipole – which is a known broken symmetry – does exactly the same thing, to provide the so-called “static EM fields”. They are not static at all, but are steady state outflows of real observable photons. So the static fields are like an unfrozen waterfall. Quoting the beautiful analogy of Van Flandern on the question of a static field actually being made of finer parts in continuous motion:
“To retain causality, we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the term ‘static’. One meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of a waterfall. A frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate. …So are … fields for a rigid, stationary source frozen, or are they continually regenerated? Causality seems to require the latter.” [Tom Van Flandern, “The speed of gravity – What the experiments say,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 250, Dec. 21, 1998, p. 8-9].


So the only problem is to build a proper “EM energy wind windmill” to independently intercept part of that flow, collect it independently, and then independently dissipate the collected energy in our loads to power them.


However, that is an asymmetric system a priori. Such systems certainly still exist in Maxwell’s actual theory, but they have not existed in all of electrical engineering since its very formation, back in 1892. That’s precisely the type of system that Morgan and crew elicited Lorentz to arbitrarily discard from the very mathematics of the electrical engineering model itself.


Now simply fund some sharp young doctoral candidates (in PHYSICS, not the sad old electrical engineering) and post doctoral scientists, with two or three sharp young professors, to go in there and restore that long-lost asymmetry and thus those long-neglected asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, and that simple and comparatively cheap action will solve the world’s energy crisis quickly, cheaply, cleanly, and permanently.


And that is precisely why it isn’t going to be done, and why such information has been deliberately withheld from publications such as yours and folks such as you.


If you wish the rigorous mathematical proof that restoration of Maxwell’s asymmetrical systems will allow building systems that extract and use free EM energy from the modern active vacuum, simply see M. W. Evans et al., “Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.


So what is going to be done about this entire silly situation by our learned Western scientific establishment? Absolutely nothing.


Hence it would be very heartwarming if China would undertake the long-needed changing and updating of the sad old electrical engineering model – and then proceed to rapidly build the new asymmetrical EM power systems freely taking all their input energy from the seething vacuum itself.



Best wishes,

Tom Bearden





 Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:09:40 -1200

From: "Wang *****"


Dear Sir/Madam


It is my pleasure meeting you Sir/Madam.

My name is **** Wang and I am a Chinese scientist working for a

weather station.

I'm on a research on the weather controlling scalar wave interface

parameters, and I am willing to get my Master Art and PhD with this

research subject. (Actually, I'm willing to make desert into

useable land, and I think scalar wave is the only chance for me.)

Is it possible to meet Mr. Bearden and get some clear understanding

according to scalar waves?

Please allow me to contact with Mr. Bearden if possible. My fellow

team members are very much have a desire to meet him face to face

and fully aware of our research with scientific understanding. We

will provide the air-tickets, hotel fees and etc needed for

Mr. Bearden to come to Beijing, China or some South East Asia's best

resort places and stay overseas.

I am sorry for the sudden proposal without having to know each other.

Please reply with good results to support our team's research or may

be world record project?

Thank you very much.


Yours Truly


***** Wang