The Tom Bearden
To: DoE PhD
Subject: RE: Re: Cheney on Energy - FYI
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 13:20:14 -0500
you are feeling better after the illness, and sorry the old bug hit
we simply must get the vacuum energy part moving, for when one
examines all the options, it is the only option that will work in
time. I point out, e.g.,
the recent increases in coal, now that the Administration solution is
going to have to rely fairly heavily on coal-fired plants to meet
those "one a week" new power plant requirements.
Some coal prices have tripled.
we have decided to just go overseas with the MEG, since we already
have the Department of Commerce release on it.
All I can say right now is that our initial discussions are
most interesting and refreshing, and so far they are proceeding much
easier than previous similar negotiations in the U.S.
a very refreshing change, we have found ourselves discussing with
foreign scientists who already know that the Maxwell-Heaviside
equations, prior to Lorentz regauging, do include such systems (open
systems in disequilibrium in their vacuum exchange).
In short, they are electrical scientists who know something
past early 1950. They are
also already aware that the present classical EM model completely
omits the vacuum interaction (much less any broken symmetry in that
interaction!), which they also know is a gross non sequitur since the
vacuum interaction (and the dipole's broken symmetry in it) have been
well-known in particle physics since the 1950s.
major problem we have found in the U.S. is that the decision
scientists at top positions advising leaders such as Secretary
Abraham, Vice-President Cheny, and President Bush, usually do not know
anything but U(1) electrodynamics, and the advice they get from
additional "expert" scientific consultants or advisers is
inferior in that these "expert advisers" also seem to know
only U(1) and also only the Lorentz-regauged Maxwell-Heaviside
equations. Many (most) do
not even "believe" in the active vacuum, or if they
begrudgingly admit it, they think it is of absolutely no consequence.
And they simply do not believe the tremendous energy density of
the vacuum, nor will they accept it, even though it is good physics
and has been for decades.
the entire scientific energy structure and infrastructure in the
United States is fearsomely welded to a small fragment (subset) of
Maxwell's theory, and even to just a Lorentz regauged subset of the
severe Heaviside truncation of it!
We have a scientific mindset problem of epic proportion.
This is precisely the same thing I ran into more than two
decades ago, when trying to draw official attention to the Russian
scalar EM weapons. It
required a very long time (and lots of ad hominem attacks, slander,
libel, questioning my ancestry, you name it) before we finally had
open confirmation by the U.S. Secretary of Defense in these words:
[terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby
they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely
through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they
can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason
why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."
Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.
Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S.
Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass
Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr.
is like "living the same thing twice."
In those days, one was considered some kind of nut if he
advocated scalar interferometry.
short, the energy crisis is completely the fault of our own scientific
community. It is NOT the
fault of the President, the Vice President, or the Secretary of
Energy! It is the direct
fault of the inferior advice being given them by the NSF, NAS, etc.
sad thing is that the U.S. scientific community is seemingly no longer
capable of even evaluating its own U(1) EM model, as it has become
almost an iron dogma. E.g.,
in the 1880s Heaviside discovered the enormous energy pouring out of
the terminals of any generator -- vastly more energy than we provide
as mechanical energy input to the shaft.
Poynting, of course, only dealt from the beginning with the
tiny component of that energy outpour that is intercepted by the
external circuit and caught and used.
Lorentz understood both the Poynting component and the
Heaviside component as well. But
no one could explain what could possibly be the source of such an
enormous energy flow from EVERY GENERATOR, BATTERY, AND SOURCE DIPOLE.
That is rigorous. Simply
check Heaviside's original papers, which I cite frequently.
Lorentz then took the attitude that this enormous Heaviside energy
flow component, missing the circuit entirely and just wasted, had
"no physical significance" (his words).
So he arbitrarily discarded it (not from NATURE, but from
MATHEMATICAL ACCOUNTING) by a clever little integration trick, still
used by all the electrodynamicists and those energy scientists
designing and building our electrical power systems, writing our
textbooks, teaching in our universities -- and advising Presidents,
Vice-Presidents, and Secretaries of Energy.
short, we most often face scientists who literally will not believe
and cannot comprehend that every generator we ever built, already
extracts enormous energy from the vacuum.
It is quite easy to prove it, for peanuts.
Any lab, university, or decent experimenter can do it.
Kraus' diagram in his Electromagnetics, Fourth Edition, shows
the nondiverged energy flow component in the form of contours, which
are MEASURED watts/square meter at each point, where a unit point
static charge will catch that much more energy.
me now give you a rigorous proof, and very simple, that every system
is already vastly overunity by producing far more energy out than we
input. Consider a perfect
DC generator, loss free, so that its efficiency is 100%.
Now consider a perfect external circuit attached, which
consists of two short lengths of perfect conducting wire, and a pure
resistance load. Let the
load be 12 ohms, and the voltage of the generator be 12 Volts D.C.
Now we have a neat little situation: We put in the mechanical
power equivalent of 12 watts to the shaft.
Since the generator is loss free, all the 12 watts are
perfectly transduced into magnetic field, and the energy in this field
is dissipated with 100% efficiency to form the source dipole.
Let us leave the source dipole for a moment.
we look at the external circuit.
There is one ampere of current (12V divided by 12 Ohms) flowing
in the external circuit. So
we are inputting 12 watts of power to
the generator shaft, and we are getting 12 watts of power output in
the resistor. All this is
clearly measurable and normal so far.
we check out John D. Kraus,
Electromagnetics, Fourth Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
Figure 12-60, a and b, p. 578 shows a good drawing of the huge
energy flow filling all space around the conductors, with almost all
of it not intercepted and thus not diverged into the circuit to power
it, but just "wasted."
We have 12 watts of power in.
We have 12 watts of power output of the resistor as heat.
By conventional Poynting considerations, we are getting out
precisely what we are inputting.
That is a blatant lie. We
are getting output from the resistor precisely as much as we are
inputting to the shaft of the generator.
Yet we also are getting out a measurable vast amount of energy
flow from those generator terminals, filling all space around that
circuit. Those Kraus
contours are experimental
can do them, or similar. Anyone
can build a little system very similar to this one, and approximating
where the devil is all that VAST EXTRA MEASURABLE ENERGY FLOW pouring
from the generator terminals, and missing the circuit entirely, COMING
we can easily prove that this Heaviside nondiverged energy flow is (1)
real, and (2) very large.
us now add in an extra set of "receiving antenna/collectors"
whose circuitry is completely separate from the DC generator circuit
with its load. Suppose we
add enough of these "little antenna/interceptor/detector"
circuits, each containing a little purely resistive load, to obtain 3
watts total in all those extra and independent circuits.
now we are inputting 12 watts. We
are getting out 12 watts in the external resistor attached to the
generator. We are also
getting 3 watts out of the "extra receiver circuits"
separately, in separate loads.
our total input is 12 watts. Our
total output is 15 watts. Our
demonstrated COP = 1.25.
how do the "experts" explain that simple
don't. But any lab worth
a tinker's dam -- and that includes any lab in DOE and in any
university -- can do a similar experiment, catching enough of the
extra "usually nondivergent EM energy flow" to bring the COP
is a very simple experiment. So is the Bohren experiment which
produces COP=18, is published in the hard literature, and is
independently replicated by two additional scientists and published in
the same issue of Am. J. Phys. that published the Bohren experiment
Lorentz's "physically insignificant" vast Heaviside
nondiverged EM energy flow component is indeed "physically
insignificant" to that single
external circuit powered by that DC generator.
But it is certainly not "physically insignificant" to
those extra "receiver/collector circuits" and their
use two viewgraphs where in the first
one Lorentz is shown in a sailboat on an ocean, in a very nice
large ocean wind. Puffing
his pipe, Lorentz is smiling and saying, "Only the wind in my
sails is of any physical significance".
In the second
slide, Lorentz is looking aside at a whole fleet of additional
sailboats, calmly sailing along and powered by that
"insignificant remaining component of the wind".
And Lorentz is saying, "How can they be using that
physically insignificant wind?"
is an exact analogy to the state of thinking that now exists in the
U.S. power industry and the U.S. scientific community concerned with
power systems. We don't
have an energy crisis, we have a collection and usage crisis—and a
vast scientific mindset crisis.
this will change in the future. But
for now, I recommend to any struggling inventor or group in overunity
system research, to "go foreign" and just quit discussing
and arguing with at best very naïve fellows and at worst dogmatists.
Overseas, one finds it most refreshing to find oneself in
discussions with highly capable scientists who know quaternion
electrodynamics, Maxwell's original complete theory, etc.
best wishes and a speedy continued recovery,
Sat, 12 May 2001 11:23:32 -0400
though we have made things more efficient this is not enough and the
"not in my back yard" mentality is a major culprit and rolling
black-outs a result. So to meet both of these we need to
distributed power units that are not polluting or intrusive on the local
esthetics. And if it can be found that covert programs have such
technologies, that's why we need CSETI!